Google to face trial in India after SC says it can't claim protection from defamation

The case before the high court said that under the law of the US, which governed the functioning of the parent company, it is not obliged or required to remove any allegedly defamatory content without court order.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that intermediaries like Google cannot claim any protection for publishing defamatory content online prior to the 2009, Photo: Reuters

The Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that intermediaries like Google cannot claim any protection for publishing defamatory content online prior to the 2009 amendment to Section 79 of the Information Technology (IT) Act. The apex court has asked Google to face trial.

A bench headed by Justice K.M. Joseph rejected the contention of Google India Private Limited that the platform to upload content on the Google`s group website was developed outside India, therefore it was virtually not possible to take down the content uploaded on the website.

"We reject the contention of the appellant (Google) that the High Court should have acted on the Google LLC conditions and found that the appellant (Google) is not the intermediary. We hold that this is a matter for trial," the top court said.

TRENDING NOW

The court verdict came on an appeal filed by Google India against the verdict given by the Andhra Pradesh High Court.

The case before the high court said that under the law of the US, which governed the functioning of the parent company, it is not obliged or required to remove any allegedly defamatory content without court order.

The court findings pointed out that there was no contention that if Google is assumed to be the intermediary, the continuance of the articles after a request by the complainant to remove them would not constitute publication from its end, as there is no court order in India.

The apex court also set aside the findings by the high court regarding the alleged refusal of the appellant to respond to the notice to remove content.

"We make it clear, however, that it is for the court to decide the matter on the basis of the materials placed before it and taking into consideration the observations contained in this judgment," noted the top court.

The apex court took into account the provisions of the Information Technology Act to indicate that prior to the amendment to Section 79, it did not protect the intermediary from being held liable for publishing or posting defamatory content.

Vishakha Industries Ltd had initiated the defamatory proceedings against the company.

Vishakha Industries is a public limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling asbestos cement sheets with seven manufacturing plants and more than 25 marketing offices all over India.

Watch Zee Business live TV below:

The first accused is alleged to be the coordinator of Ban Asbestos India, a group hosted by Google, which published articles against the company. The company claimed it was singled out though there were also other groups manufacturing asbestos cement.

An article was published titled "Visaka Asbestos Industries Making Gains" in July 2008. A trial court has summoned the accused in the case through an order saying, "Whereas your attendance is necessary, answer to Charge of U/s.500, 501 of I.P.C. r/w 34 you are hereby directed to appear in person or by pleader before the AA.C.M.M. Court on the day 09.09.2009 10.30 a.m."

TAGS:

Google Technology